Spirit and Flesh
An Outsider's Compassionate Look at Fundamentalism

In order to film a documentary on life in a fundamentalist church, Harvard graduate and son of a Methodist minister, James Ault, spent three years with Reverend Frank Valenti and his congregation at Shawmut River church. Rather than abstractly analyzing the fundamentalist phenomenon from an intellectual distance, Valenti plunged into its most important expression -- life in a local church.

His assessment is surprisingly gracious and demonstrates his attempt to thoroughly understand the culture and context of Shawmut River. Many things outsiders deem hypocritical or inconstant prove to be understandable from within fundamentalist culture. For example, he demonstrates how opposition to state-sponsored sex education makes sense from a fundamentalist mindset. Even though the material claims to not push any particular values on students, the fact that it leaves values and morals up to individual judgment rather than to divine sanction is a moral position in itself. Another example: a pro-war stance and anti-abortion position are not at odds in the fundamentalist mind precisely because both arise from the belief in the importance of personal sacrifice for the common good -- the soldier for his country and the mother for her child. A final example: Fundamentalist women carry more authority than outsiders might expect and feminists will allow. Many fundamentalist women who believe in male headship are strong, dynamic, and active women. Reverend Frank's wife, Sharon, fully aware of her influence speaks of herself as "the neck that turns the head." Subsequently, fundamentalist women view feminism as oppressive rather than liberating, because it seeks to remove them from the traditional roles that empower them in conservative culture.

Ault demonstrates how a commitment to moral absolutes is not as "primitive" as his fellow intellectuals believe. In his church experience, he discovered how moral absolutes were usually applied very particularly and personally. "I came to appreciate how moral absolutes drawn from scripture served in more flexible, adaptive and practical ways than we might otherwise imagine. This permitted not only sensible approaches to particular situations but also sensible adaptations to change over time, without altering the actual maxims or formulae used to order life" (204).

In the process of filming his documentary, James Ault experienced a spiritual awakening. Although he does not embrace the conservative positions of fundamentalists, he has come to embrace life with God: "it was, above all, my years at Shawmut River that had awakened my senses to God's presence and had encouraged me, and given me ways, to relate to God" (339). He continues, "their influence as a moral community penetrated even to my most habitual actions and influenced me permanently for the better" (348).

Although riddled with problems (before the book ends, Shawmut River experiences a church split and Pastor Valenti is removed from leadership), Ault discovers a loving community at Shawmut River. "And if at times in their own relationships members of Shawmut River showed a capacity for impatience, pride, self-justifying distortions of truth and perhaps even hate, how were they any different in this regard from other human communities I have known, such as academic departments, new-left collectives and mainline churches?" (349).

I am not a fundamentalist and I never will be. I have known people who have been hurt by fundamentalism. And yet, at the same time, I have known people who have been helped by it as well. Even though it is not the way I choose to express my Christian faith, I am thankful for this book written by an objective observer. His kind and gracious insights have given me a new appreciation for the fundamentalist phenomenon. Note: The chapter where Pastor Frank desperately tries to save a broken marriage is incredibly touching. In his own homespun, charming way he seeks to give guidance and comfort in a very difficult situation.



Comments

Very interesting! I intend to get my hands on that book. I am a liberal Christian, mainline pastor, and I struggle to understand fundamentalists too. I recently attended a James Dobson political rally, observing the people around me and taking notes on what the speakers said and on the behaviors and reactions of those in attendance. It seemed very strange to me. If you are interested in more information on that, check out the "Church and Politics" entries in my blog at www.knoup.blogspot.com. I have added your blog to my favorites list, and look forward to more of your ravings. Thanks Theo.

Posted by: Sophia at October 22, 2004 1:26 PM

Rich - I just got back from vacation and finished this book during the trip. What a gracious treatment of potentially difficult material! My one question is whether or not he explores in detail and is fully candid in evaluating what happens when fundamentalists engage their culture. Armstrong's "The Battle for God" and other similar studies of fundamentalism such as Martin Marty's multi-volume "The Fundamentalism Project" suggests a real issue with intolerance. Aust makes the comment that liberals are actually guilty of being as intolerant of fundamentalists as they claim the fundamentalists themselves are. But if we are to take the political, social and cultural statements of the fundamentalists like those Ault engages with at face value, do we not have to address slightly more candidly the anger and in too-many situations the hate that fundamentalists advocate? Would such candor also have to deal with the reality that few fundamentalisms, regardless of whether they are Christian, Islamic or Hindu, allow for any form of democratic let alone religious pluralism. The comment Augustine is credited as having contributed to the lexicon of human's tenuous grasp of grace that "on the essentials unity, on the non-essentials liberty, and in all things charity" seems to come apart when you are engaging a culture where everything is an essential - an intrinsic part of fundamentalism. I appreciated the sociological perspective Ault brought and I was deeply and profoundly personally touched by his grace, but I think some greater danger exists within this group than his book presents. In an age where predominant sociologists, political theorists, theologians, social scientists and philosophers fear the clash of religious fundamentalists, does Ault's analysis go far enough in its analysis? I admire his grace and hold out hope that his attitude will be embraced by more people (myself included); perhaps it is only in such a spirit that we can find some common ground.

Posted by: Ben Shobert at November 11, 2004 1:36 PM

Well, I appreciate Ben and Sophia's interest in my book, Theo, and, to begin with, your insightful and appreciative account of it. Thanks for the communicative service you provide. To Ben, I'd like to say, regarding fundamentalists' ruling out "any form of democratic let alone religious pluralism," that their separatist posture presumes (and requires) others not sharing their beliefs, and their tendency to continue to split from each other, involving the free and involuntary shift of members' allegiances to one pastor or another, has embedded within it its own forms of tolerance and substantive democracy--up to a point, I guess. Members vote with their feet and their tithes. Still, Ben has raised some important questions I'm glad to see someone asking. (Oh yes, everything isn't essential either; they recognize liberty in nonessentials. However, they draw the lines differently and, in their arguments with, say, "moral relativists" or liberals, claim always to be talking about essentials, non-negotiables--like, perhaps, democracy and pluralsim). To Sophia, keep on blogging. Oops! Enough for now. Have to get the kid to bed. Jim Ault P.S. I'm posting an Op-Ed on the elections soon on my website: jamesault.com

Posted by: Jim Ault at November 18, 2004 8:33 PM

What are your sentiments on same sex marriage in Canada?

Posted by: Bill at July 13, 2005 8:59 PM

Leave a comment